The Jesus Cup
The oldest artifact to mention Jesus by name.
There is an artifact
dated to the first century A.D. that many believe mentions Jesus by name. The
artifact is a ceramic bowl or Careened cup that, aside from a missing handle,
is in excellent condition. The remarkably well-preserved artifact was
discovered in 2008 by a team from the European Institute for Underwater
Archaeology (IEASM). The team was led by Frank Goddio as they worked near the now-submerged
islands of Antirhodos. This site is located in the harbor of the Egyptian city
of Alexandria and is historically linked to the palace, and some speculate that
it is the tomb of Queen Cleopatra.
The inscription, which is
in Greek, reads, DIA CHRSTOU O GOISTAIS. This translates into “Through Christ
the magician”. The accuracy of the translation is a key point of controversy,
which will be explored later. If this
translation is correct, as many scholars believe, this would be the oldest
artifact or item ever found to mention Jesus. This would mean that the story or
reputation of Jesus as a miracle worker had reached as far as Alexandria before
50 A.D. This is far sooner than was previously thought.
Two important notes. The
first is the word ‘Magician’. This is thought to be a reference to the stories
of Jesus, powers to heal and to perform other miraculous feats. Again, this
shows Jesus’ reputation went far beyond a localized group and apparently
encompassed the entire area of the Mediterranean Sea. Some see this as external
proof of Jesus performing miracles. The second item of note is the belief that this
cup did not belong to a Christian. It is believed this cup belonged to a fortune
teller in Alexandria. The fortune-teller was attempting to invoke the name of
Jesus and His power in their own practices. This confirms the fact that Jesus
was well known in Alexandria at the time the cup was in use. The user was
attempting to impress their customers with the name of a well-known magician,
thus increasing their own worth. If Jesus had not been well known, His name
would have had no value.
The primary area of
controversy with this artifact is the translation or reading of the
inscription. As mentioned, many scholars
believe the inscription reads “Christou,” which would translate to
Christos.Christ. Some scholars are not so sure. Some believe the inscription
reads “Chrestou” which they believe is simply the name Chrestos. This changes
the overall translation of the text from “Through Christ the
Magician/Chanter” to possibly “A gift from Chrestos to the Ogoistais”. Ogoistais was a known religious fraternity. Some
who believe the second inscription bases it on the fact that the cup originated
from Western Asia Minor. While this may be a valid point, it is almost
unanimously agreed that the inscription was added to the cup after it was fired,
perhaps as much as a century later. This raises the likely possibility that the
inscription was made by the end user in Alexandria, not in Asia Minor.
If the inscription on the
cup does reference Jesus Christ, it would be the first mention of the name
known to exist, possibly older than any of the writings of the New Testament.
This would result in the need to rethink how quickly Christianity spread in the
region. If the cup does mention Jesus, it is a strong indication that
Christianity spread at a much faster rate than is currently believed. If the
single letter in the inscription can be resolved, this cup could be confirmed
as proof of Jesus’ power being well known throughout the region, far earlier
than previously believed.

Comments