History Supports the Authorship of Daniel
Of all the books in the Old Testament, the Book of Daniel has arguably faced the most intense scrutiny. The reason for this is simple: its prophecies are astonishingly accurate. Daniel predicts the rise and fall of empires, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome, with such precision that many skeptical scholars have concluded it could not possibly have been written in the 6th century BC by a Jewish exile. Instead, they argue, it must have been written around 165 BC, during the Maccabean revolt, by an anonymous author pretending to be Daniel. This view, known as the "Maccabean Hypothesis," essentially claims the book is history masquerading as prophecy. However, for those who take the text at face value, the Book of Daniel claims to be the eyewitness account of a statesman serving in the courts of Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus. When we look past the skepticism and examine the linguistic and archaeological evidence, a compelling case emerges: the writer of this book was intimat...